Теми рефератів
> Реферати > Курсові роботи > Звіти з практики > Курсові проекти > Питання та відповіді > Ессе > Доклади > Учбові матеріали > Контрольні роботи > Методички > Лекції > Твори > Підручники > Статті Контакти
Реферати, твори, дипломи, практика » Курсовые проекты » Business Аssociations

Реферат Business Аssociations





at a premium, ie, a price not available to other shs. Exceptions to these rule include a bare sale of office (invalid), the corporate action theory, sales involving fraud or nondisclosure, and knowing sales to transferees who plan to loot or deal unfairly with the corp.

E.SHAREHOLDER SUITS

1.DIRECT (INDIVIDUAL) SUITS - a direct suit may be brought by a sh on his own behalf for injuries to sh interests. If the injury affects a number of shs, the suit may be brought as a class action.

2.DERIVATIVE SUITS - if a duty owed to the corp has been abridged, suit may be brought by a sh on behalf of the corp.

a) Distinguish Direct From Derivative Suits - the test is whether the injury was suffered by the corp directly or by the sh, and to whom the D's duty was owed

1) Close corporations - in some cases, minority shs have been allowed to bring a direct action against controlling shs for breach of fiduciary duty

b) Prerequisite to Suit - Exhaustion of Corporate Remedies - the P-sh must specifically plead and prove that he exhausted his remedies within the corporate structure

1) Demand on directors - the P-sh must make a demand on the dirs to remedy the wrong, unless such demand would have been futile. Note that in the absence of negligence, self-interest, or bias, the fact that a majority of dirs approved the transaction does NOT itself excuse the demand.

I) Model statutes - under both model statutes, demand should be excused only if it is shown that irreparable injury to the corp would result;

ii) Effect of rejection of demand - if the matter complained of does not involve wrongdoing by the dirs, the board's good faith refusal to sue bars the action, unless the P-sh can raise a reasonable doubt that the board exercised reasonable business judgment in declining to sue. If the suit alleges wrongdoing by a majority of dirs, the board's decision not to sue will NOT prevent the derivative suit.

2) Demand on shareholders - in most states, the p-sh must also make a demand on shs unless excused (eg, the alleged wrongdoing is beyond the power of the shs to ratify). Where demand on shs is required, a good faith refusal to sue by the majority of disinterested shs will preclude the suit.

c) Qualifications of Plaintiff - a few states require the P to be a registered sh; most states also allow a beneficial owner of shares to bring suit. Also, a sh of a parent corp can bring a derivative suit on a subsidiary's cause of action. Shs cannot complain of wrongs committed before they purchased their shares except:

1) where the P acquires shares by operation of law;

2) in section 16 (b) violations;

3) where serious injustice will result;

4) where the wrong is continuing in nature.

The P must fairly and adequately represent the interests of all shs

d) Securities For Expenses - in a number of states, the P, u...


Назад | сторінка 25 з 26 | Наступна сторінка





Схожі реферати:

  • Реферат на тему: Ghandi and the myth of non-violent action
  • Реферат на тему: Direct-costing
  • Реферат на тему: Foreign Direct Investment in Kyrgyzstan
  • Реферат на тему: Політекономічний дослідження ідей direct-costing
  • Реферат на тему: Congress of the United States