s of the corresponding budgets. On the contrary, the given norm should be interpreted as obliging bodies of legislative (representative) authority to take into account corresponding charges at formation and adoption of federal, regional and local budgets [2]. , The blank in the legislative regulation, kept as a result of inactivity of legislative (representative) bodies of the government and representative bodies of local self-management for a long time, sufficient for its elimination, can not serve as an absolute obstacle for the sanction of disputable questions if realization of rights and legitimate interests of citizens proceeding from the Constitution of the Russian Federation depends on it [3]. separate regulations of federal laws on the federal budget, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation has formulated the legal position according to which the federal law on the federal budget creates appropriate financial conditions for realization of the norms fixed in other federal laws, issued up to its adoption and providing financial obligations of the state, that is supposing granting any means and material guarantees and the necessity of the corresponding charges as the federal budget should be based on the principles of equation, reliability and reality, and the Russian Federation as the legal social state can not independently refuse performance of public - legal obligations taken. At the same time, the federal legislator has the right to suspend action of financial norms providing realization of rights and freedoms of the citizens only if there should be stipulated the appropriate mechanism of the corresponding compensation, forms and ways of which can change but the volume should not decrease [4]. , According to the above mentioned, it follows that insufficiency of budgetary funds can not serve the ground for restriction of constitutional rights of the citizens and only attracts necessity to carry out budgetary regulation for the purpose of equation of the corresponding budgets. of all levels of the budgetary system of the Russian Federation are intended for material maintenance of functions of each public unit. In case of insufficiency of own means for covering of the corresponding charges the subjects of the Russian Federation can have the right to expect rendering of financial special-purpose aid by the Russian Federation [5]. legislator, carrying out financial regulation according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, should be guided by the priority of maintenance of rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen and should guarantee creation of appropriate financial conditions for their realization. Thus there is predetermined the public - legal character of regulation of budgetary relations acting as economic expression of the sovereignty of the state, of the material basis of realization of public functions and powers of the Russian Federation, the subjects of the Russian Federation and municipal units [6]. of development and improvement of directions of financial policy both of the whole Russian state, and of its subjects make the subject of scientific researches of scientists working directly with the legal matter, and of scientists - economists. However it is necessary to note, that development of economic processes is inextricably related with legal maintenance of financial policy, and therefore research of problems of law is connected with studying of economic situation in the country on the whole and in its separate regions.
The literature
constitutional review court
1. Конституція Придністровської Молдавської Республіки.- Тирасполь, 2006. - С. 62.
. Там же.- С. 97-98.
. Там же.- С. 100.
. Там же.- С. 102.
. Закон Придністровської Молдавської Республіки «Про Конституційний суд Придністровської Молдавської Республіки».- С. 44.
. Конституція Придністровської Молдавської Республіки.- Тирасполь, 2006. - С. 63.
. Там же.- С. 100.
. Там же.- С. 64, 72.
. Вітрук Н.В. Конституційне правосуддя в Росії (1991-2001рр.): Нариси теорії і практики.- М .: «Городець - іздат», 2011. - С.108.
. Лучин В.О., Дороніна О.Н. Скарги громадян до Конституційного суду Російської Федерації.- М., 2008. - С. 124-125.
. Ебзеев Б.С. Конституційний суд Російської Федерації: правова природа, функції, основні напрямки діяльності//Вісник Конституційного суду Російської Федерації.- 2006. - № 6. - С. 18.
. Ебзеев Б. С. Конституція. Правова держава. Конституційний Суд.- М., 2007. - С. 165.
. Морщакова Т.Г. Розмежування компетенції між Конституційним судом та іншими судами Рос...
