licy issue, particularly depending on whether nations can agree to work together to limit possible future risks.
В· Ineffective strategy to fight terrorism. Critic Cordesman criticized US strategy to combat terrorism as not having enough emphasis on getting Islamic republics to fight terrorism themselves. Sometimes visitors have been misidentified as "terrorists." Mathews suggests the risk of nuclear terrorism remains unprevented.
В· Historical instances of ineffective policies. Generally during the nineteenth century, and in early parts of the twentieth century, the US pursued a policy of isolationism and generally avoided entanglements with European powers. After World War I, Time Magazine writer John L. Steele thought the US tried to return to an isolationist stance, but that this was unproductive. He wrote: "The anti-internationalist movement reached a peak of influence in the years just before World War II. "But Steele questioned whether this policy was effective; regardless, isolationism ended quickly after the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. Analysts have wondered whether the US pursued the correct strategy with Japan before World War II; by denying Japan access to precious raw materials, it is possible that US policy triggered the surprise attack and, as a result, the US had to fight a two-front war in both the Far East as well as Europe during World War II. While it may be the case that the Mideast is a difficult region with no easy solutions to avoiding conflict, since this volatile region is at the junction of three continents; still, many analysts think US policy could have been improved substantially. The US waffled; there was no vision; presidents kept changing policy. Public opinion in different regions of the world thinks that, to some extent, the 9/11 attacks were an outgrowth of substandard US policy towards the region. The Vietnam War was a decade-long mistake. br/>
Bibliography
1. "Europe and Hizbullah," Jerusalem Post, 15 February 2005.
2. Manfred Gerstenfeld, interview with Dore Gold, "Europe's Consistent Anti-Israeli Bias at the United Nations, "Post-Holocaust and Anti-Semitism, No. 34, 1 July 2005. p> 3.
4.http ://guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2008/jul/23/michaelwhitespoliticalblog207
5.
6.
