ages have lasted longer in the 21st century than they did in the 1990s.2011 study at the University of Iowa found that having intimate relations before age 18 was correlated with a greater number of occurrences of divorce within the first 10 years of marriage .2008 study by Jenifer L. Bratter and Rosalind B. King conducted on behalf of the Education Resources Information Center examined whether crossing racial boundaries increased the risk of divorce. Using the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth, the likelihood of divorce for interracial couples to that of same-race couples was compared. Comparisons across marriage cohorts revealed that, overall, interracial couples have higher rates of divorce, particularly for those that married during the late 2000s. The authors found that gender plays a significant role in interracial divorce dynamics: According to the adjusted models predicting divorce as of the 10th year of marriage, interracial marriages that are the most vulnerable involve White females and non-White males (with the exception of White females / Hispanic White males) relative to White / White couples. White wife / Black husband marriages are twice as likely to divorce by the 10th year of marriage compared to White / White couples, while White wife / Asian husband marriages are 59% more likely to end in divorce compared to White / White unions. Conversely, White men / non-White women couples show either very little or no differences in divorce rates. Asian wife / White husband marriages show only 4% greater likelihood of divorce by the 10th year of marriage than White / White couples. In the case of Black wife / White husband marriages, divorce by the 10th year of marriage is 44% less likely than among White / White unions. Intermarriages that did not cross a racial barrier, which was the case for White / Hispanic White couples, showed statistically similar likelihoods of divorcing as White / White marriages [1, p. 84].
It `s possible to make some conclusions on the basis of given information. First, the proportion married at each age has been surprisingly stable over more than a century; the pattern in 1980, for instance, is remarkably similar to that in 1880., divorces in the 1960s were unusual, reflecting not only more marriage, but earlier marriage., the data for 2000 suggest a very different pattern, with marriage less prevalent among young adults, but more prevalent among those at older ages. This trend toward rising age at first marriage represents both a return to, and a departure from, earlier patterns. The return to earlier patterns is the later age at which men first marry; in 1890, the median age at which men first married was 26, declining to 23 by the mid - 1950s, and then returning to 27 in 2004. The departure is that the age gap between men and women has declined through the past century, with the median age at which women first marry rising from 22 in 1890 to 26 in 2004.fact is that in American divorce statistics exists shrinking gap between the ages of husbands and wives: those over 65 are now much more likely to be married than at any other time in the past. In fact, those over 65 are now as likely to be married as are those aged 16 to 65. The larger proportion of people married at older ages reflects greater life expectancy for both men and women and a decreasing gap in the difference between men s and women s life expectancy. Additionally, some of this increas...
