n amendments in the Main law to provisions of articles 157 and 158 of the Constitutions of Ukraine. Thus, the Constitutional Court carries out a role of an independent arbitrator in the system of authority. According to V.A. Tumanov, the main task of the institute of control authority will consist in performance of a role of control of authorities [13], first of all concerning restraint of legislative and executive branches.the theory of a constitutional law there are different classifications of functions of the body of the constitutional justice and the constitutional control as the legislation gives an imperfect list of them. In particular, M. Kelman singles out: 1) explanatory (prime) function - the Constitutional Court gives obligatory interpretation of the Constitution and laws; 2) preventive function - interpretational acts of the Constitutional Court prevent infringements of the Main law and by that guarantee leadership of the law within all territory of Ukraine; 3) function of control of authorities [14] .. D. Savenko, analyzing activity of the Court, singles out the following functions: 1) function of justice (of the constitutional control) - disputes and the conflicts related to the competence of the Constitutional Court, the latter considers the established procedure and makes a decision on behalf of the state; 2) function of interpretation of the Constitution and laws of Ukraine; 3) function of legal protection of the Constitution - all activity of the Court directed on maintenance of legal protection of the Main law, the constitutional system established by it, the rights and freedoms of the person and the citizen and other provisions; 4) function of maintenance of observance of a principle of division of the government (an arbitration) - solving disputes and conflicts concerning competence, the Court acts in a role of the arbitrator. According to its powers concerning such disputes the Court can examine constitutionality of statutory acts only regarding the powers of a corresponding authority; 5) law enforcement function [15] .. V. Teslenko presents such a circuit of functions of a body of the constitutional jurisdiction: control function (actually judicial) will consist in solving o the constitutional disputes which are realized through legal proceedings concerning constitutionality of laws and other statutory acts;
integration function is characterized by the fact that the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine is directed on integration of efforts of the government with the purpose of protection of the Main law; coordination function - decisions on a recognition as unconstitutional of laws and other statutory acts provide practical realization in legal practice of a principle of division of authorities as they direct actions of bodies of the government on realization the of their powers within limits of the competence stipulated by the Constitution of Ukraine;
law-making function - the Constitutional Court of Ukraine is a unique body of the constitutional jurisdiction, authorized to make decisions of an obligatory character which are final and can not be appealed against;
political function - decisions of the Constitutional Court are directed on maintenance of political stability in the country [16]., as an authority the Constitutional Court is a subject of a politics and an integral element of the political system of Ukraine. And though it does not consider matters of a political character directly its acts influence a course of political life. M. Teslenko mark that the Constitutional Court of Ukraine can not isolate itself from problems of politics as politics is incorporated in the Constitution. It also can not isolate itself from an intermediary mission in legal and political conflicts as this supreme judicial body protects of the constitutional system of our country. At the same time a decision of the Constitutional Court should have legal grounds, providing leadership of law but not political expediency [17]. To confirm his words M. Teslenko points out the idea of ??Ovsepyan which emphasizes that increase of a role of a body of the constitutional jurisdiction in the political system is possible only when its activity does not destroy specialization of the judicial constitutional control in the mechanism of division of authorities [18]., it is frequently enough when the Constitutional Court is involved in solving political questions. Cases about using of the Ukrainian language [19], about All-Ukrainian referendum on popular initiative [20], etc. can serve as examples of this. Making of the mentioned decisions, the body of the constitutional justice in any case supports the position of a certain party of the dispute. It is especially dangerous during pre-election campaign when such an initiative can lead to outburst of oppositions.generally political function is shown...
