Modern English is exceptionally rich in homonymous words and word-forms. It is held that languages ​​where short words abound have more homonyms than those where longer words are divalent. Therefore it is sometimes suggested that abundance of homonyms in Modern English is to be accounted for by the monosyllabic structure of the commonly used English words.only words but other linguistic units may be homonymous. Here, however, we are concerned with the homonymy of words and word-forms only, so we shall not touch upon the problem of homonymous affixes or homonymous phrases When analyzing different cases of homonymy we find that some words are homonymous in all their forms, ie we observe full homonymy of the paradigms of two or more different words as, eg, in seal a sea animal and seal-a design printed on paper by means of a stamp '. The paradigm "seal, seal's, seals, seals '" is identical for both of them and gives no indication of whether it is seal (1) or seal (2) that we are analyzing. In other cases, e.g. seal-a sea animal 'and (to) seal (3) -' to close tightly, we see that although some individual word-forms are homonymous, the whole of the paradigm is not identical. Compare, for instance, the-paradigms:
. (To) seal-seal-seal's-seals-seals '
. seal-seals-sealed-sealing, etc.
. Professor O. Jespersen calculated that there are roughly four times as many monosyllabic as polysyllabic homonyms. It is easily observed that only some of the word-forms (eg seal, seals, etc.) Are homonymous, whereas others (eg sealed, sealing) are not. In such cases we cannot speak of homonymous words but only of homonymy of individual word-forms or of partial homonymy. This is true of a number of other cases, e.g. compare find [faind], found [faund], found [faund] and found [faund], founded ['faundidj, founded [faundid]; know [nou], knows [nouz], knew [nju:], and no [ nou]; nose [nouz], noses [nouziz]; new [nju:] in which partial homonymy is observed.the examples of homonymy discussed above it follows that the bulk of full homonyms are to be found within the same parts of speech ( eg seal (1) n-seal (2) n), partial homonymy as a rule is observed in word-forms belonging to different parts of speech (eg seal n-seal v). This is not to say that partial homonymy is impossible within one part of speech. For instance, in the case of the two verbs Me [lai] - 'to be in a horizontal or resting position'-lies [laiz]-lay [lei]-lain [lein] and lie [lai] -' to make an untrue statement'-lies [laiz]-lied [laid]-lied [laid] we also find partial homonymy as only two word-forms [lai], [laiz] are homonymous, all other forms of the two verbs are different. Cases of full homonymy may be found in different parts of speech as, eg, for [for]-divposition, for [fo:]-conjunction and four [fo:]-numeral, as these parts of speech have no other word-forms...
