rection, as in any case the court reveals the constitutionally-legal sense of the verified norm and gives interpretation of its legal contents, obligatory both for the body, that adopted the statutory act and for all the subjects applying this act. Thus there appears the removal of uncertainty in understanding of the norm, directed to the uniform application and, as a result, to the exception of possible infringement of rights and freedoms of the citizens.an example we can show the considered by the Constitutional Court of Republic Karelia the case about the verification for correspondence to the Constitution of Republic Karelia of some positions of Paragraph 2 item 1 Hunting rules in Republic Karelia.the opinion of the citizen, applying to the court, the uncertainty of the disputed norm contained in that on its literal sense any appearance with a hunting gun on the roads of the common use is equated with the production of hunt, although the presence of the hunting gun on the roads does not relate to hunt.the clear idea of ??the sense of the specified legal regulation, the Constitutional Court, along with the recognition of the disputed norm constitutional, has worked out the legal position according to which the order of the disputed norm regarding indication to the roads of the common use is distributed on the part of roads of the common use, passing through the territory of hunting lands. Only in this sense it is necessary to understand and to apply the disputed norm of hunting rules in Republic Karelia, equating with the production of hunt the presence of the hunting gun on the roads of the common use. In all the other cases, presence of the hunting gun on the roads of the common use outside the hunting lands is regulated by other statutory legal acts within the framework of other legal relations.more characteristic example is the case about the verification for correspondence to Constitution of Republic Karelia of the Law of Republic Karelia from February, 6, 2006 No. 957-ЗРК «About the gratuitous transfer of the state property of Republic Karelia in ownership of Spaso-Preobrazhenskiy Valaamskiy stavropigialny monastery». According to the given Law, the monastery was given building of the Winter hotel in which there have been disposed the municipal school, dwellings and other objects of social setting. The Constitutional Court of Republic Karelia, having recognized the adopted Law constitutional, verified, whether the given law does not infringe the constitutional rights for the citizens on different grounds of using by the passed property, on education, on dwelling, on freedom of religion. The judicial act made in the process of the constitutional legal proceeding on the given case settles not only the concrete constitutionally-legal dispute but also provides the lasting legal protection of the above mentioned constitutional rights of the population, living on the island of Valaam., the Constitutional Court of Republic Karelia is the special universal institute to guarantee constitutional safety of the person, society, state.
The literature
constitution european law
1. Адміністративне право України: Підручник/За заг. ред. С.В. Ківалова.- Харків: «Одіссей», 2014. - С. 510.
. Копієвська О. Правове регулювання отношений у сфері культури//Право України.- 2014. - №8.- С. 82-85; Пережняк Б.А. Стан законодавчої бази соціально-культурного будівництва в Україні//Юридичний вісник.- 2004. - №1.- С. 79-81; він же, Правові засади государственной политики в соціально-культурній сфере//Державне управління: теорія и практика/За заг. ред. В.Б. Авер'янова.- К .: Юрінком Інтер, 2008. - С. 363-372.
. Задіхайло О.А. Організація управління культурою в Україні (адміністративно-правовий аспект): Автореф. дис. канд. юрид. наук. Харків, 2006. - 19 с .; Овсієнко-Миронова Г.В. Організаційно-правові засади управління видавнича справа в Україні: Автореф. дис. канд. юрид. наук.- Харків, 2006. - 20 с .; Ракша Н.С. Адміністративно - правове забезпечення права громадян на освіту: Автореф. дис. канд. юрид. наук.- Львів, 2007. - 20 с.
. Проект Закону України «Про культуру»//Культура і життя - 2006. - 30 серпня.
