rvice; of DPS, its employees and their close relatives (protection against unlawful them actions by criminal elements and gangs). on the objectives and legal status of units to combat corruption, the officers are entitled to: overt and covert investigative operations in the order determined tional Law of Ukraine "On Operational Activities"; operational and other employees by DPS, which allow violations of current legislation, disclose official secrets and the like; the illegal activities of offenders in order to bring them to disciplinary, administrative or criminal liability; departmental check on the activities of tax authorities; intentions of individuals and gangs to prepare and commit illegal and provocative actions to DPS and its employees.of the main tasks of units to combat corruption is pre redzhennya, identification and disclosure of malfeasance and corruption of the tax. However, to ensure its performance is not made of legal conditions.already noted, according to the established MIA, SBU and STA of Ukraine on-line all information, reports, statements concerning DPS employees about anti-statute activity while on duty sent out of the Interior Ministry and the Security Service to check the tax departments. The service provides objective and comprehensive test that proves every day in practice. However, it alone can not decide on materials inspection in order of art. 97 of the CPC of Ukraine. By law, the service cos Wren to fight corruption and crime among tax officials, and the body of inquiry, it is only in respect of tax crimes.is an objective need to make appropriate changes to the art. 101 Code of Ukraine and put into units of service rights and obligations of the inquiry and one hundred regards to malfeasance by employees DPS during execution service ref duties. For example, internal security MIA following full-novazhennyamy endowed and it does not affect the interests of other law enforcement agencies, in contrast, helps combat these crimes.should be noted that the facts of bribery as the most dangerous corruption relatively infrequent crimes among the tax service. Ra together with the attempts to bribe employees of tax authorities found quite often.the employee tax authorities in respect of which was an attempt to bribe, not reported to the department for combating corruption and security, and if such efforts it is not noticed, the briber might get the impression that the tax "sold". That is why the service is widespread explanatory po bot among the tax services that have to act in such situations, the law, and as you know, the law provides criminal penalties for such acts.approaches yield positive results, the tax authorities themselves are included in the struggle for the purity of their ranks. There are numerous examples of responses according to the Law on attempted bribery. In example, in September last year, prosecutors Sumy criminal case against private entrepreneurs "H" resident Sumy per cent. 17, 170 of...
