l is set not only before the individual, but before each system as well, regardless of its complexity. Nevertheless, none of definitions of a system does practically contain the concept of purpose/goal, although it is the aim, but not the signs of action, emergence factor or something else, which is a system forming factor. There are no systems without goal/purpose, and to achieve this purpose the group of elements consolidates in a system and operates. Purposefulness is defined by a question "What can this object do?" "The system is a complex of discretionary involved elements jointly contributing to the achievement of the predetermined benefit, which is assumed to be the core system forming factor ". One can only facilitate the achievement of specific goal, while the predetermined benefits can only be the goal. The only thing to be clarified now is who or what determines the usefulness of the result. In other words, who or what sets the goal before the system? The entire theory of systems is built on the basis of four axioms and four laws which are deduced from the axioms: axiom # 1: a system always has one consistent/invariable general goal/purpose (the principle of system purposefulness, predestination); axiom # 2: the goal for the systems is set from the outside (the principle of goal setting for the systems); axiom # 3: to achieve the goal the system should operate in a certain mode (the principle of systems 'performance) - law # 1: the law of conservation (the principle of consistency of systems 'performance for the conservation of the consistency of goal/purpose), law # 2: the law of cause-and-effect limitations (The principle of determinism of systems 'performance), law # 3: the law of hierarchies of goals/purposes (the principle of breakdown of goal/purpose into sub-goals/sub-purposes), law # 4: the law of hierarchies of systems (the principle of distribution of sub-goals/sub-purposes between subsystems and the principle of subordination of subsystems); axiom № 4: the result of systems 'performance exists independently from the systems themselves (The principle of independence of the performance result). Axiom # 1: the principle of purposefulness. At first it is necessary to determine what meaning we attach to the concept "system", as far as at first sight there are at least two groups of objects ":" systems "and" non-systems ". In which case the object presents a system? It is not likely that any object can be a system, although both systems and non-systems consist of a set of parts (components, elements, etc.). In some cases a heap of sand is a structure, but not a system, although it consists of a set of elements representing heterogeneity of density in space (grains of sand in conjunction with hollows). However, in other cases the same heap of sand can be a system. So, what is the difference then between the structure-system and the structure-non-system, since after all both do consist of elements? All ob...
