nship that there can exist between regional variation and social stratification. For many years, this relationship has been responsible for the misleading assumption that non-standard dialects are unpleasant deviations from the purity and beauty of the standard norm. Nevertheless, from what we have searched in this paper, it should be clear by now that linguistic judgments based on aesthetic values ​​are to be completely discarded from any kind of linguistic discussion. The growing presence of some non-standard varieties in some of England s official institutions (eg the BBC) has been extremely beneficial to their widespread acceptance as linguistic varieties in their own right, and not as ungrammatical or incorrect deviations.
Bibliography
1. Аракин В. Д. Історія англійської мови: Учеб. посібник для пед. ін-тів по спец. "Иностр. яз. ". - М.: Просвещение, 1985
. Будагов Р. А. Проблеми розвитку мови. - М.: Наука, 1965
. Жирмунський В. М. Національна мова і соціальні діалекти. - Л., 1936
4. Ellis A. "Linguistics and time", 2004
. Demo, D. "Dialects in education" (ERIC/CLL Resource Guide Online). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Language and Linguistics, 2000
. GRADDOL, D. et al. (Eds.) Changing English. London: Routledge, 2007
. MELCHERS, G. & P. SHAW. World Englishes. London: Arnold, 2003
. TRUDGILL, PSociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society. London: Penguin, 2000 [1974].
. Wells, JC: Accents of English (3 vol.: Introduction; The British Isles; the British Isles), CUP, 1982.
10. <
11. merriam-webster.com <
