also ratification of the European charter of the local self-management. Taking into account, that the Constitution of the Russian Federation (item n - Part 1 Article 72) relates establishment of the common principles of organization of the system of the organs of the government and the local self-management to the subjects of joint conducting of the Russian Federation and the subjects of the Russian Federation, speaking about the sources of regulation, it is necessary to mention the necessity of inclusion into this base of statutory acts of the subjects of the Russian Federation, in particular, in our case, Law of Kabardin-Balkar Republic from 18.10.1995 No. 21-РЗ About local self-management in Kabardin-Balkar Republic (which has lost its force in connection with adoption of the new FL No. 131-FL) and a number of other acts specifying the above-mentioned regulations., practical realization of the principles mentioned in the given documents has faced serious difficulties. The Federal Law of +1995 has remained in many respects declarative and in concrete, not to the full reflecting social and economic realities. Proceeding from this law in spite of the fact that there have been adopted other documents, in particular, laws on financial bases of the local self-management, the majority of municipalities could receive neither sufficient tax potential, nor sufficient means from the budgets of the higher level. It remained unclear, what level of the power should be responsible. All this has resulted, according to Chairman of the State Duma B. Gryzlov: not only numerous conflicts between the local self-management and the regional power, but also disappointment of the citizens in the local self-management .Kabardin-Balkar Republic the local self-management has always drawn the most steadfast attention. The model of the local self-management created in Kabardin-Balkar Republic is called to take into account the difficulties, of the developing practice of organization of the local self-management, of the problem of interaction of the organs of the government with institutions of the local self-managementt, historical and other local traditions of the peoples of the Republic. It was necessary to create the mechanism which, on the one hand, would allow the population to determine independently directions, ways, forms, ways of transition to the local self-management, including organizational - legal structure, proceeding from specificity of the territories, and from degrees of readiness to accept responsibility for the decision of local questions; On the other hand - not to interfere with the state to realize national tasks, as the aiming of the local self-management only on maintenance of interests of the local communities in separation from the republican (and federal), evidently leads in uncontrollability in region , and, hence, to deterioration of the population. Thus, in the majority of the subjects of Russia, during five years the level of the public power has not been generated yet.problem of all the subjects, is in absolutization of independence (independence) of the organs of the local self-government on the background of inadequate distribution of the subjects of conducting and the powers between the level of local self-management and the level of the regional government, actual absence of the financial basis (property, fair distribution of tax incomes) and personnel potential.the background of such pitiable condition with the organization of the level of the local public power in Russia on the whole, the organs of the government of Kabardin-Balkar Republic have undertaken a number of efforts for the purpose of leveling the specified lacks of the federal legislation. Thus, there has originally come understanding: it is inadmissible to identify the local self-management, with the government of nation-wide, regional or local level. However, it is inadmissible the full opposition of the government (government) and local self-management in general as it is made by many researchers - supporters of communal or public theories of the local self-management, asserting that local self-management is not the government, that local self-government institutions are not included into the system of the organs of the government.our point of view, as well as from the point of view of other supporters of the state theory of the local self-management, the local self-management can not be considered otherwise as in the set with the common organism of the whole government comprising it as a component. The similar point of view is reflected, from our point of view, in the European Charter about local self-management. According to the Charter (item 3 Article 4), realization of the state powers, as a rule, should be mainly assigned on the organs of the government mostly close to the citizens raquo ;, ie on the organs of local self-management being inherently the organs of local (instead of regional or ce...
