Теми рефератів
> Реферати > Курсові роботи > Звіти з практики > Курсові проекти > Питання та відповіді > Ессе > Доклади > Учбові матеріали > Контрольні роботи > Методички > Лекції > Твори > Підручники > Статті Контакти
Реферати, твори, дипломи, практика » Новые рефераты » Validity of decisions of the constitutional court: practical and theoretical aspects

Реферат Validity of decisions of the constitutional court: practical and theoretical aspects





red in the order established by the law. In case admission of the legal act unconstitutional has created the blank in legal regulation the Constitution of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika [5] shall be directly applied. , The special constitutional status of the Constitutional Court of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika as the supreme judicial body of the constitutional control, assumes general obligatory action of its acts on the entire territory of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika. to Article 6 of the Constitution of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika the government of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika is realized on the basis of division into legislative, executive and judicial powers [6]. And according to the given constitutional norm and item 2 Article 86 of the Constitution of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika the court comprises 6 judges. The President of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika, the Supreme Soviet of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika and the congress of judges of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika appoint two judges of the Constitutional Court correspondingly [7]. The decision of court by the specified structure of judges is made jointly. Hence, at decision-making on the concrete question, the given structure of the court has already expressed the opinion, therefore shall have no right to reconsider repeatedly the decision made earlier. The decision of the Constitutional Court contains the special legal norm finally confirming constitutionality of the regulation disputed earlier, removes the existing earlier uncertainty concerning its conformity to the Constitution. The established by the Constitutional Court fact of conformity of the norm of the law or of any other statutory act to the Constitution of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika can not be established by anyone and should be admitted by all. Besides the Constitution of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika does not stipulate the opportunity of revision by the Constitutional Court of decisions made by it and formation for the given purpose of any other body. Thus, being the body of the constitutional control in the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika, the Constitutional Court guarantees the supremacy of the Constitution of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika, provides the observance of the principle of division of the powers, and guarantees the responsibility of the state under the citizen and the citizen under the state. In our opinion, in case of disagreement of the person with the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika, the given person according to Articles 10, 46 of the Constitution of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika, shall have the right, to apply in the established order to interstate bodies on protection of the rights and legitimate interests [8]. the Constitutional Court of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika acts as the special higher judicial instance, its decisions get the special validity. That is, fixing constitutionally the principle of validity of the decision, the decision of the Constitutional Court shall act directly and shall not require confirmation by other bodies and officials. The decision of the Constitutional Court brings finality and stability in law applying practice. And, the decision of the Constitutional Court admitting the position of the law or any other statutory act (according to the competence) not corresponding to the Constitution of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika, is the special norm simultaneously canceling its action. The given regulation brings the judgment to the level of the law, therefore it is already not simply the act of application of the law, it shall be the law. Therefore the law applier is the professional and is obliged to own not only statutory legal acts, but judgments as well. our opinion, judge of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation Vitruk NV has very precisely and correctly specified the validity of the decision of the Constitutional Court, having noted, that the validity of final conclusions of the Constitutional Court expressing special norms, is equal to the validity of the Constitution as the legislator, and no other bodies of public authority can cancel or change conclusions of the Constitutional Court in final decisions about the verification of constitutionality of laws or other statutory acts or their separate regulations [9]. out interpretation of the Constitution of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika, the Constitutional Court makes decisions without which the text of the Fundamental Law can not be considered full any more. Interpretation of the constitutional norm which has received official interpretation by the Constitutional Court is inadmissible by any other body. Besides the decision of the Constitutional Court can be of...


Назад | сторінка 2 з 8 | Наступна сторінка





Схожі реферати:

  • Реферат на тему: Principle res judicata in practice of the European court on human rights an ...
  • Реферат на тему: Role of resolutions of the constitutional court of the Russian Federation i ...
  • Реферат на тему: Constitutional system of the Russian Federation and role of the constitutio ...
  • Реферат на тему: About the elasticity of constitutional principles and constitutional policy
  • Реферат на тему: The constitutional right of citizens to appeal of acts of bodies of the exe ...