that the most ample opportunities of judicial protection of social rights by the citizens is given in Republic Severnaya Ossetia - Alaniya as it is the only subject of the Russian Federation in which they are allocated with the right to application to the constitutional court of the republic not only with the request about the verification of constitutionality of the law, statutory legal act issued by the Head of republic, by the Parliament and the Government of the republic, by ministries, the state committees, other bodies of the government and bodies of local self-management but also with the request on constitutionality of the statutory legal act of the public association, state and municipal establishment contradicting , in their opinion, the Constitution of the republic; with the request about interpretation of norms of the Constitution of Republic Severnaya Ossetia - Alaniya and about the verification of constitutionality of contracts and agreements. And, according to the activities of the Constitutional Court of republic, such ample opportunities allow not only to restore already infringed rights, but also to prevent their infringement by the statutory legal act. In conclusion we shall note, that in Republic Severnaya Ossetia - Alaniya legal maintenance of the social rights occupy the significant place which is supplemented with wide legislative opportunities of their judicial protection.to international non-recognition of Pridnestrovie (the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika), named in the Western Europe Transnistria, its constitutional system (the Constitution and jurisprudence of its Constitutional Court created in 2002) still remains not enough to jurists of Western Europe. The aim of the given article is to present the given system in comparison with the French constitutional tradition (the Constitution of 1 958 and other legislative texts of value applied by the Constitutional Council and both Supreme Courts - the State Council, the Arbitration Court), showing things in common and disagreements between both systems. The given research can cause, thus, reflections about the opportunity of mutual enrichment of the both constitutional systems compared.
1) The general reference to human rights, meaning more expanded sense in the Constitution of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika.
The French Constitution does not contain the formulation about the human rights, meaning individual rights and social rights, except for several common reflections about political parties and freedom of belief. The constitutional judges in тисяча дев'ятсот сімдесят-одна considered, however, that the Declaration on human rights of 1789 (individual rights), and the preamble to the Constitution of 1946 (social rights) had the constitutional value. It is to be added that the European Convention on human rights has thre lawful value owing to the resolution of the State Council Nikolo of 1989., recommendations in the question on human rights ordered in France and recognized in the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika are appreciably comparable. We mean refusal from racial or religious discriminations (Article 17 of the Constitution of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika), presumption of innocence under the legislation (Article 22), inviolability dwellings (Article 24), freedom of belief, (Article 27), media without censorships (Article 28), personal access of information (Article 29), the right to free moving (Article 25), freedom of worship and freedom of belief (Article 30), the right to application in court (Article 46), the principle of promulgation of laws (Article 63), publicity of proceeding, the principle of competitiveness (Article 85). All these elements are similar to lawful norms applied in France.is necessary to note, that Pridnestrovie has taken care of emphasizing duties of the citizens: Realization of rights and freedoms should be inseparable from execution by the citizen and the person of the duties under the society and the state (Article 47) .is the successful initiative which reminds that the citizen is not the selfish consumer of the right and that he should always take into account interest of the collective and act depending on it. This idea is the basis of the French republican principles which, unfortunately, at present have tendency to disappearance.Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika is not as Jacobic as it is in France as it recognizes the right to speak in three languages ??including in the bodies of the power. Despite the recent struggle of defenders of regional languages ??in France, all of them have not been recognized yet at the constitutional level, and recently they have even decided, that the French language should be the language of the republic (frankly speaking, the linguistic uniformization in France is very old) .is necessary to note, meanwhile, that in Pridnestrovie as again...
