rope after World War II, however, indicates that clandestine flows differ significantly from legal ones. Illegal Portuguese migrants tend to be isolated and unskilled males in their prime; this increases the likelihood that legal flows do not accurately reflect actual migratory flows between 1950 and 1988. p> One corrective for the discrepancies in the official figures is to examine the relative attraction of the principal recipient countries. According to French and German records, we can correct the distribution in Table 10.2. Table 10.1 (Legal Departures)) shows that the two preferred European destinations (France and Germany) attracted 35 percent of the total between 1950 and 1988, and that the three overseas destinations (Brazil, Canada, and the United States) attracted 47 percent. Table 10.2 (Legal and Illegal Departures), by contrast, indicates that the two key European destinations accounted for 59 percent of the total, and the three overseas destinations for just 30 percent, in the same period.
TABLE 10.1 Principal Destinations of Portuguese Legal Emigration, 1950-1988 (in thousands)
Legal Departures
Percentage
France
347
25.0
Brazil
321
23.0
United States
193
14.0
Germany
135
10.0
Canada
138
10.0
Other
241
18.0
TOTAL
1,375
100.0
TABLE 10.2 Principal Destinations of Portuguese Emigration, 1950-1988 (in thousands)
Legal and Illegal Departures
Percentage
France
1,024
48.0
Brazil
321
15.0
United States
193
9.0
Germany
235
11.0
Canada
138
6.0
Схожі реферати:
Реферат на тему: Psychology of legal education and estimation. Psychology of legal estimati ...Реферат на тему: Legal system Реферат на тему: Subject of legal linguistics Реферат на тему: Legal globalization: law, inevitability, prospectsРеферат на тему: Legal regulation of guard of lands of housing and public building
|
Український реферат переглянуто разів: | Коментарів до українського реферату: 0
|
|
|