ectly in its massive form. p align="justify"> «Philosophy of Law» Hegel has absorbed some of the ideas of previous generations of Philosophy. First of all it is - an idea even Plato and Aristotle on the integrity of the life of the policy, as well as Aristotle thought that the state is the precursor of individuals and that man - «being political.» Idea of ​​moral integrity, imbued with German philosopher from ancient thinkers, later it was developed in accordance with: the views of Hobbes about the political centralization, the reasonableness of life in the state, the concept of «general will» JJ Rousseau, with the ideas of historicism, national spirit and unity will SH.-L. Montesquieu. Nevertheless, the constitutional views of Hegel's much deeper and more in-depth than its predecessors.rejected the idea of ​​state of nature and the contractual origin of state, assuming that the contract exists only in relations governed by private law and can not be a source of statehood.criticized individualism natural law views of Hobbes, JJ Rousseau, Kant, who came out of primacy is not the whole - of the state, the national spirit and the individual.his philosophical and legal writings of Hegel criticized as an empirical way of interpreting the rights inherent in his opinion, Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques-term Rousseau and formal manner characteristic of Kant. For empirical approach, he noted, dominated contemplation and consideration of unilateralism, while formal approach defined reflection and absolution mind.definitions and initial objective spirit is independent will. She - a practical reason, that is the mind that operates in the external world. So will consist of two opposite aspects: general and individual. But will disclose their identity only at the higher stages, but here it becomes independent. In its lower forms it receives its contents from the outside, from the impressions and inclinations, she herself, being a common basis, appears as the ability to choose between different experiences and in this form acts as a tyranny. Content here will not match the shape. Consequently, the self is an internal contradiction in their definitions. This - the struggle between the different impressions that come to clash with each other. Choosing between them self chooses a common goal - happiness, since this goal depends on the approval of random impressions, it is a separate and random. Common in it, because the slopes - contradictory and varied. So fortunately, defined as pleasure inclinations are not attainable, it, according to Hegel, is the progress in infinity. The meaning of true progress is to require such a general framework that would afford all won individual. It is necessary to separate the essential from the unessential in impressions. It is essential to recognize that is not only taken outside content, but also meets the same freedom. In this lies the true common ground where abstract universal and i...
