ccuse a plaintiff.
The court may listen to testimony of one side.
All transactions in modern society are very complex.
Nobody should have basic know ledge of law.
4. Прочитайте визначення слів і здогадайтеся, про яких словах з тексту йдеться
1. _____ Is the party that is accused in court of a crime or a civil offence. p align="justify">. _____ Is the party that starts or carries out civil proceedings. It is usually a private citizen or a company. p align="justify">. _____ Is a civil legal proceeding against someone. p align="justify">. _____ Is an official court decision on the case. p align="justify">. _____ Are an official body whose job is to make sure that people obey the law, to catch, and to protect people and property. p align="justify">. _____ Is someone whose job is to advise people about laws, write formal documents or represent people in court. p align="justify">. ______ Is a house or a room where all the information about the crime is given so that it can be judged. p align="justify">. ______ Is a sum of money that you owe somebody. p align="justify">. _____ Is a formal statement that something is true, such as the one a witness makes in court of law. p align="justify">. ______ Is money that has been lost by a business, a person or a government. p align="justify">. ______ Is legal means (documents) regulating relations between companies. p align="justify"> 5. Підберіть відповідний за змістом відповідь із запропонованих варіантів і обгрунтуйте свій вибір двома - трьома реченнями. Почніть свою відповідь одним з наступних виразів. :) I quite agree with the statement that ___ because ...) Just what I think .... because .....
. Relations between people are regulated by) government) prescriptive laws) peoples experience) customs and traditions
. If we always break the rules, other members of society may) refuse to have anything to do with us) carry precise penalties) use a system of courts) consult the police
. When governments make laws for their citizens) they use the power of the police to enforce them) they use justice) they observe public opinion) they try to implement common sense. p> 6. Побіжно прочитайте текст (3 хв.) Без словника і знайдіть у тексті англійські еквіваленти російським пропозиціям. p>. Вони використовують судову систему, що спирається на право поліції примусово забезпечувати дотримання закону. p>. Відносини між людьми регулюються поєднанням всіх цих правил (норм). p>. ... Понесе покарання у вигляді штрафу або тимчасового відсторонення від участі у грі. p>. Рефері може подати цивільний позов проти гравця і зажадати матеріального відшкодування за завдані йому тілесні каліцтва ...
..... так як держава розглядає антигромадську поведінку не як питання взаємин між людьми, а як загрозу добробуту і порядку в суспільстві.
When governments make laws for their citizens, they use a system of courts backed by the power of the police to enforce these laws. Of course, there may be instances where the law is not enforced against someone-such as when young children commit crimes, when the police have to concentrate on certain crimes and therefore ignore others, or in countries where there is so much political corruption that certain people are able to escape justice by using their money or influence. But the general nature of the law is enforced equally against all members of the nation.made laws are nevertheless often patterned upon informal rules of conduct already existing in society, and relations between people are regulated by a combination of all these rules. This relationship can be demonstrated using the example of a sports club.a member of a rugby club is so angry with the referee during a club game that he hits him and breaks his nose. At the most informal level of social custom, it is probable that people seeing or hearing about the incident would criticize the player and try to persuade him to apologize and perhaps compensate the referee in some way. At a more formal level, the player would find he had broken the rules of his club, and perhaps of a wider institution governing the conduct of all people playing rugby, and would face punishment, such as a fine or a suspension before he would be allowed to play another game. Finally, the player might also face prosecution for attacking the referee under laws created by the government of his country. In many countries there might be two kinds of prosecution. First, the referee could conduct a civil action against the player, demanding compensation for his injury and getting his claim enforced by a court of law if the player failed to agree privately. Second, the police might also start an action against the player for a crime of violence. If found guilty, the player might...
