Law Review. 21. 1988. P. 587-603; Gross S. R. The American advantage: the value of inefficient litigation// Michigan Law Review. 1987. February. P. 734-757; Martone F. J. Adversary adjudication on trial// Arizona State Law Journal. 21. 1989. P. 227-235; Miller A. L. The adversary system: dinosaur or phoenix? // Minnesota Law Review. 69. 1984. P. 1-37; Reitz J. З Why we probably cannot adopt the German advantage in civil procedure// Iowa Law Review. 75. 1990. May. P. 987-1009; Rosenberg M. Resolving disputes differently: adieu to adversary justice?// Creighton Law Review. 21. 1988. P. 801-822. br/>
[27] загальфедеральним зміни були імплементовані в Правила цивільного судочинства більшості штатів. Див докладніше: Cavanagh E. D. The CJRA of 1990 and the 1993 amendments to the FRCP: can systemic ills afflicting the federal courts be remedied by local rules?// Saint John's Law Review. 67. 1993. Fall. P. 721-755; Cloud M. The 2000 amendments to the FRCP and the future of adversarial pretrial litigation// Temple Law Review. 74. 2001. P. 27-57; Hench V. E. Mandatory disclosure and equal access to justice: the 1993 federal discovery rules amendments and the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action// Ibid. 67. 1994. Spring. P. 179-263; Subrin S. N. Fudge points and thin ice in discovery reform and the case for selective substance-specific procedure// Florida Law Review. 46. 1994. January. P. 27-56; Tobias З 1) Improving the 1988 and 1990 judicial improvements acts (Symposium on civil justice reform)// Stanford Law Review. 46. 1994. July. P. 1589-1634, 2) The 2000 Federal civil rules revisions// San Diego Law Review. 38. 2001. P. 875-892; Vairo G. M. Foreword (Symposium: Happy (?) Birthday Rule 11)// Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. 2004. Winter. P. 515-562. - Зазначимо, що американський досвід був ретельно вивчений при підготовці описаної вище реформи цивільного судочинства в Англії.
[28] Детальніше про проблему В«Рембо-адвокатівВ» см.: Медведєв І. Р. Про науку цивільного процесу ... С. 90-93, 142-146. br/>
[29] George J. A. The В«RamboВ» problem: is mandatory CLE the way back to Atticus? // Louisiana Law Review. 62. 2002. Winter. P. 485; The lffh Annual judicial conference of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit// Federal Rules Decisions. 146. 1993. April. P. 216-232. br/>
[30] Приклади В«програмнихВ» виступів по даного питання: В«It's how you play the gameВ». Interview with Judge Marvin E. Aspen// Trial. 34. 1998. July. P. 28-32; Adrogue S. В«RamboВ» style litigation in the 3rd millennium - the end of an era? // Houston Lawyer. 2000. March/April. P. 22-25; Appleton P. M. Is winning everything: В«ProfessionalismВ» doesn't have to mean В«DoormatВ»// Oregon State Bar Bulletin. 2002. April. P. 21-23; DiLorenzo L. P. Civility and professionalism// New York State Bar Journal. 1996. Jan...
