s c? nsid? rably incr? as? d during th? p? ri? d? f M? ,? sp? cially in th? 13th and 14th c? nturi? s, th? ugh a f? w s? unds w? r? l? st (/? /, /? /,/x /).
In? Mn? tw? n? w s? unds app? ar? d (/? /, /? /) and a f? w symb? ls w? r? n? l? ng? r in us? (?,?,?). Th? numb? r? f graph? m? s t? r? pr? s? nt s? unds was m? r? ? r l? ss stabl?.
Finally, it must b? said that ph? n? l? gical and? rt? graphical variati? ns c? nc? rning c? ns? nants hav? n? t b ?? n significant in th? last 400 y? ars (fr? m? Mn? t? Pd?), and m? st? f th? m hav? d? alt with and l? d t? simplificati? n.? y? u call a br? ad r? ll a c? b, batch, br? ad cak? , Barm cak? ? r scuffl? r? H? W d? y? u pr? n? unc? th? w? rds cup and plant? And ar? y? u sitting? r sat at this c? mput? r? Th? UK is a rich landscap? ? f r? gi? nal acc? nts and dial? cts,? ach? vid? nc? ? f? ur s? ci? ty s c? ntinuity and chang? ,? Ur l? Cal hist? Ry and? Ur day-t? -day Liv? s. This sit? captur? s and c? l? brat? s th? div? rsity? f sp? k? n? nglish in th? s? c? nd half? f th? tw? nti? th c? ntury. ? rtainly, th? r? is a r? lati? nship b? tw ?? n th? ? nglish s? und syst? m and th? ? nglish sp? lling syst? m. H? W? v? r, th? r? lati? nship b? tw ?? n s? und and sp? lling is n? ith? r straightf? rward n? r? bvi? us. If it w? r? , Many? F us w? Uld sp? ll m? r? accurat? ly than w? d ?. What is? Bvi? Us is that th? s? unds? f? nglish ar? n? t th? sam? as th? l? tt? rs? f? nglish.? t?:Alth? Ugh it is? Bvi? Us in an int? ll? ctual s? ns? that s? unds and l? tt? rs ar? n? t th? sam? thing, m? st stud? nts w? rking thr? ugh this app? ndix will? n? ccasi? n mak? ? rr? rs thr? ugh mistaking s? unds f? r l? tt? rs. ? patt? rning f? und in th? s? und syst? m? f? nglish is a r? fl? cti? n? f th? physi? l? gy? f th? v? cal tract. Th? patt? rns? f th? ? nglish s? und syst? m mak? s? ns? in t? rms? f h? w s? unds ar? mad? (and, particularly, f? rv? w? ls, h? ws? unds ar? p? rc? iv? d). ? basic principl? inv? lv? d is m? dificati? n? f th? air fl? w. Wh? n making a s? und air m? v? s thr? ugh th? v? cal c? rds in larynx, thr? ugh th? thr? at, and? n? ut thr? ugh th? m? uth? r n? s?. As it m? V? s, th? air fl? w is m? difi? d thr? ugh vibrating th? v? cal c? rds, by? p? ning (? r n? t? p? ning) th? v? lum t? l? t part? f th? fl? w g? ? ut thr? ugh th? n? s? , And by c? Nstricting th? air fl? w partially? r c? mpl? t? ly in th? m? uth.
? nc? th? ? nglish s? und syst? m is und? rst ?? d, it b? c? m? s? asi? r t? mak? s? ns? ? ut? f th? sp? lling syst? m? f? nglish and it b? c? m? s p? ssibl? t? mak? s? m? s? ns? ? ut? f th? pr? bl? ms all stud? nts hav? l? arning t? sp? ll and? ut? f th? pr? bl? ms sp? ak? rs? f? th? r languag? s hav? in l? arning t? pr? n? unc? ? nglish. ? w W? rds fr? m? ld? last chapt? r p? ints? ut th? s? n? w w? rds ar? c? nstantly? nt? ring th? languag?apt? r? xamin? s fiv? pr? c? ss? s by which th? y d? s ?: cr? ating, c? mbining, sh? rt? ning, bl? nding, and shifting th? grammatical us? s? f? ld w? rds. Shifting th? m? anings? f? ld w? rds is c? nsid? r? d als? in th? pr? c? ding chapt? r, and b? rr? wing fr? m? th? r languag? s is c? nsid? r? d in th? n? xt. ? ATING W? RDS? St n? w w? rds c? m? in? n? way? r an? th? r fr? m? ld? r w? rds. T? cr? at? a w? rd? ut? f n? ? th? r m? aningful? l? m? nts (a r ?? t cr? ati? n) is a v? ry rar? ph? n? m? n? n ind ?? d. Th? trad? nam? K? Dak is s? M? tim? s cit? d as such a w? rd. It first app? ar? d in print in th? U.S. Pat? nt? ffic? Gaz? tt? ? f одна тисяча вісімсот вісімдесят вісім and was, acc? rding t? G? ? rg? ? astman, wh? inv? nt? d th? w? rd as w? ll as th? cam? ra it nam? s, a pur? ly arbitrary c? mbinati? n? f l? tt? rs, n? t d? riv? d in wh? l? ? r in part fr? m any? xisting w? rd (M? nck? n, Suppl? m? nt I), th? ugh his bi? graph? r p? ints t? th? fact that his m? th? r s family nam? b? gan with th? l? tt? r K.? th? r c? mm? rcial nam? s-lik? th? s? f? r th? artificial fabrics nyl? n (at? rm n? v? r trad? mark? d), Dacr? n, and? rl? n-als? lack an? tym? l? gy in th? usual s? ns?. Acc? Rding t? a Du P? nt c? mpany publicati? n (C? nt? xt 7.2, 1978), wh? n nyl? n was first d? v? l? p? d, it was call? d p? lyh? xam? thyl? n? adipamid?. R? alizing th? stuff n ?? d? d a catchi? r nam? than that, th? c? mpany th? ught? f dupr ?? h, an acr? nym f? r Du P? nt pulls rabbit? ut? f hat, but inst? ad s? ttl? d? n n? -run until it was p? int? d? ut that st? ckings mad? ? f th? mat? rial w? r? n? t r? ally run-pr ?? f. S? th? sp? lling? f that w? rd was r?...
