n. Thomas Andrew argues that the language of science is governed by the aim of the functional style of scientific prose, which is to prove a hypothesis, to create new concepts, to disclose the internal laws of existence, development, relations between different phenomena, etc. The language means used, therefore, tend to be objective, precise, unemotional, and devoid of any individuality; there is a striving for the most generalized form of expression [Thomas, 1990: 245]. At the same time popular scientific style is varied according to the usage of different language means as epithets, metaphors, simile making popular scientific literature emotional, expressive and interesting.by side with the peculiarities above language means are called to establish contact between the author and the reader making the information comprehensible. This intimization leads to an acquirement of knowledge by the reader.of science plays a very important role in the modern world giving an access to the essence of things not resorting to high complexity of scientific texts. A person of a particular sphere can become aware of completely different field regarding to popular scientific literature. Paige Lightman, the American physicist, writer, and social entrepreneur, claims that a real scientist isn ta real scientist if he can t explain his theory to a common barman in order the latter understands it. Thus we can say that popularization of science is even important for the scientists themselves [Hawking, 2003: 208].
References
1.Кіріченко Н.В. (1991) Функціонально-стилістичний аспект різних типів тексту. Перм.- 23 с.
2.Назаренко А.Л. (2000) Науково-популярна література як об'єкт функціональної стилістики та лінгводидактики. Москва.- 8 с.
3.Стівен Хокінг (2013) Майбутнє простору-часу. АМФОРА: Санкт - Петербург.- 208 с.
.Aitchison J. (1994) Words in the Mind: an Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Basil Blackwell Ltd: Oxford.- 145p.
5.Bakst A. (1997) Mathematics. Its Magic and Mastery. Princeton (N.G.) Van Nosfraud.- 842 p.
.Carroll L. (1968) The Dynamics of the Parti-cle//Diversions and Digressions of Lewis Carroll. New York.- 60-70 pp.
7.Crystal D., Davy D. (1969) Investigating English Style. Longman.- 251p.
8.Dodgeson Charles L. (1972) Algebraic Formulae and Rules. Oxford.- 167p
9.Galperin I.R. (2014) English Stylistics. Librokom: Moscow.- 9p., 314p.
10.Gilman W. (1961) The Language of Science. Harcourt, Brace amp; World: INC.- 4p., 97p.
.Hartkopf R. (1965) Mathematics for those who hate it.Adelaide Pugby.- 17p
.Lehtsalu U., Liiv G., Mutt O. (1973) An introduction to English Stylistics. Tartu.- 13p.
.McMillan V.E. (2001) Writing Papers in the Biological Sciences. Boston.- 314p.
.Shakkhovsky V.I. (2008) English Stylistics. KomKniga: Moscow.- 86p., 88p.
15.Sherman I.W., Sherman V.G. (1986) Biology: Human Approach: N.Y.-Oxford.- 636p.
16.Thagard P. and Beam G. (2004) Epistemological Metaphors and the Nature of Philosophy. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Malden.- 505p.
17.Thomas A. (1990) Style in English Language.London.- 245p.
18.Journal National Geographic (2003-2005 years)
.Journal New Scientist (2007 March)
.Journal Scientific American (2000 - 2004 years)
Internet sources:
.Rosenberg J. (2012) Scientific Jargon.
22.Science Dictionary (2002) Formula.
